<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which strand of contemporary Christianity most appeals to you?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://anitamathias.com/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://anitamathias.com/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/</link>
	<description>Anita Mathias&#039;s Blog on Faith and Art</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 01:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anita		</title>
		<link>https://anitamathias.com/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anitamathias.com/blog/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Peter and Simon:-).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter and Simon:-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Harding		</title>
		<link>https://anitamathias.com/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Harding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anitamathias.com/blog/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If I say that my top reading combines Rob Bell, Brian McLaren, Peter Rollins, Alastair McGrath and Tom Wright, I suppose I end up as something of a slightly liberal conservative charismatic evangelical.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I say that my top reading combines Rob Bell, Brian McLaren, Peter Rollins, Alastair McGrath and Tom Wright, I suppose I end up as something of a slightly liberal conservative charismatic evangelical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sipech		</title>
		<link>https://anitamathias.com/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sipech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anitamathias.com/blog/2011/12/13/which-strand-of-contemporary-christianity-most-appeals-to-you/#comment-16945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s often less about a particular &quot;type&quot; of church than the local church that it right for you. I grew up in a baptist church and have tried methodist, united reformed, anglican, non-denominational and have ended up at a charismatic pentecostal church. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason for that though was not because I went looking for one. I went looking for a welcoming church where I would be challenged. I don&#039;t agree with everything that gets taught, but what that does is it prompts me to check my own thoughts and beliefs, finding the evidence and adjusting &amp; growing as I do so. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any church that prompts that kind of thinking process is probably the right one to be in. But while someone like me might be challenged by a charismatic, another may be challenged by a more traditionalist church.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Church (as a whole) is a rich a varied beast; the only thing that saddens me is when one strand sets itself up as in some way better or more authentic than others. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To taste and see that the Lord is good doesn&#039;t mean the ecclesiastical equivalent of having fish n&#039; chips every night.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#39;s often less about a particular &#8220;type&#8221; of church than the local church that it right for you. I grew up in a baptist church and have tried methodist, united reformed, anglican, non-denominational and have ended up at a charismatic pentecostal church. </p>
<p>The reason for that though was not because I went looking for one. I went looking for a welcoming church where I would be challenged. I don&#39;t agree with everything that gets taught, but what that does is it prompts me to check my own thoughts and beliefs, finding the evidence and adjusting &#038; growing as I do so. </p>
<p>Any church that prompts that kind of thinking process is probably the right one to be in. But while someone like me might be challenged by a charismatic, another may be challenged by a more traditionalist church.</p>
<p>The Church (as a whole) is a rich a varied beast; the only thing that saddens me is when one strand sets itself up as in some way better or more authentic than others. </p>
<p>To taste and see that the Lord is good doesn&#39;t mean the ecclesiastical equivalent of having fish n&#39; chips every night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
